Comments on: Evropski poslanci znajo poskrbeti zase, ugotavlja revizor http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/ družbene, politične, kulturne, ekonomske, medijske in okoljske razprave Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:44:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1 By: darja http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8223 darja Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:23:25 +0000 http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8223 MEPs vote to keep their expenses scams secret Senior members of the European Parliament turned their fire on a whistle-blower for disclosing the existence of a confidential report into widespread misuse of expenses yesterday as they voted for it to stay secret. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3441660.ece MEPs vote to keep their expenses scams secret

Senior members of the European Parliament turned their fire on a whistle-blower for disclosing the existence of a confidential report into widespread misuse of expenses yesterday as they voted for it to stay secret.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....441660.ece

]]> By: REVIZOR UGOTAVLJA: EVROPSKI POSLANCI ZNAJO POSKRBETI ZASE http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8190 REVIZOR UGOTAVLJA: EVROPSKI POSLANCI ZNAJO POSKRBETI ZASE Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:51:21 +0000 http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8190 [...] http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/ [...] […] http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/.....a-revizor/ […]

]]> By: Der Komisar http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8185 Der Komisar Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:48:39 +0000 http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8185 Whatever. Mene bolj zanima, koliko davkoplacevalskega denarja zmece slovenska vlada za luksuzna stanovanja diplomatov v Bruslju. To bi bila dodana vrednost za ta blog. Poznam enega slovenskega uradnicka, ki ubozec sameva v 120m2 fletu. Cena: 2000 evrov/mesec. Ampak slavnega slovenskega predsedovanja vendar ne bomo mazali s taksnimi neljubimi podrobnostmi, morda bi se kaksnemu Slovencu, ki se z 850 evri povprecne place trudi preziveti v Ljubljani, to zdelo nepotrebno zapravljanje. Whatever. Mene bolj zanima, koliko davkoplacevalskega denarja zmece slovenska vlada za luksuzna stanovanja diplomatov v Bruslju. To bi bila dodana vrednost za ta blog. Poznam enega slovenskega uradnicka, ki ubozec sameva v 120m2 fletu. Cena: 2000 evrov/mesec. Ampak slavnega slovenskega predsedovanja vendar ne bomo mazali s taksnimi neljubimi podrobnostmi, morda bi se kaksnemu Slovencu, ki se z 850 evri povprecne place trudi preziveti v Ljubljani, to zdelo nepotrebno zapravljanje.

]]> By: darja http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8181 darja Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:19:53 +0000 http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-8181 This text is a classic example of EU institutional stupidity. Bad news does not exist. And, anybody who says so is a liar (that’s you Chris). Eursoc also explores the mindset. Anyway it is terribly complicated accountancy thing – too complicated for you and definitely, definitely not fraud. Moreover, this actually a technical thing, a “systems analysis”, it is not a political thing. Anybody who says it is a political thing is being critical. People who are critical are worse than the bad news (that doesn’t exist anyway), see England Expects for another example. To stop criticism, and the possibility people might confuse something technical (above their heads and not their business, i.e. confidential) it must be kept secret. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/brunowaterfield/feb08/mepfraud.htm This text is a classic example of EU institutional stupidity. Bad news does not exist. And, anybody who says so is a liar (that’s you Chris). Eursoc also explores the mindset. Anyway it is terribly complicated accountancy thing – too complicated for you and definitely, definitely not fraud. Moreover, this actually a technical thing, a “systems analysis”, it is not a political thing.

Anybody who says it is a political thing is being critical. People who are critical are worse than the bad news (that doesn’t exist anyway), see England Expects for another example. To stop criticism, and the possibility people might confuse something technical (above their heads and not their business, i.e. confidential) it must be kept secret.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/f.....pfraud.htm

]]>