<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Komentarji na: Žižka za Obamo: Idealizem ali cinizem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/</link>
	<description>družbene, politične, kulturne, ekonomske in okoljske razprave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:12:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Avtor: Matej Mlakar</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8273</link>
		<dc:creator>Matej Mlakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8273</guid>
		<description>@igor vidmar

Na to sem jaz slučajno (!!!) naletel med prebiranjem Harpersa.

Mislim, da je za rešitev te uganke najbolj zaslužen forum Hyde-park.si, saj avtor izrecno citira uporabnika &quot;hopcefizlja&quot;, ki mu je del idejo o zamenjavi s Berlusconijem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@igor vidmar</p>
<p>Na to sem jaz slučajno (!!!) naletel med prebiranjem Harpersa.</p>
<p>Mislim, da je za rešitev te uganke najbolj zaslužen forum Hyde-park.si, saj avtor izrecno citira uporabnika &#8220;hopcefizlja&#8221;, ki mu je del idejo o zamenjavi s Berlusconijem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: igor vidmar</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8272</link>
		<dc:creator>igor vidmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8272</guid>
		<description>sem našel(eno varianto:- v Harper&#039;s Magazine-!?! še v People ali Sun-u bo prej kot pri nas doma: resna zadrega ali ultimativni dissing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sem našel(eno varianto:- v Harper&#8217;s Magazine-!?! še v People ali Sun-u bo prej kot pri nas doma: resna zadrega ali ultimativni dissing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: igor vidmar</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8271</link>
		<dc:creator>igor vidmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8271</guid>
		<description>Matej, hvala- kje je to bilo objavljeno? V Mladini že ne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matej, hvala- kje je to bilo objavljeno? V Mladini že ne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: Matej Mlakar</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8270</link>
		<dc:creator>Matej Mlakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8270</guid>
		<description>Žižek se je zmotil:

In attributing to Noam Chomsky the statement that Obama is a white guy who took some sun-tanning sessions, I repeated an untrue claim which appeared in Slovene media, so I can only offer my unreserved and unconditional apology.

I would like to add that, even if the statement I falsely attributed to Chomsky were to be truly made by him, I would not consider it a patronizingly racist slur, but a fully admissible characterization in our political and ideological struggle. There are African-American intellectuals who allow themselves to be fully co-opted into the white-liberal academic establishment, and they are loved by the establishment precisely because they seem “one of us,” white with a darkened skin. This is why, I think, the statement I falsely attributed to Chomsky does NOT amount to the same as Silvio Berlusconi’s misleadingly similar characterization of Obama as beautiful and well tanned: Berlusconi’s remark dismissed Obama’s blackness as an endearing eccentricity, thus obliterating the historical meaning of the fact that an African-American was elected President, while the remark I falsely attributed to Chomsky, if accurate, would point towards the ambiguous way Obama’s blackness can be instrumentalized to obfuscate our crucial political and economic struggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Žižek se je zmotil:</p>
<p>In attributing to Noam Chomsky the statement that Obama is a white guy who took some sun-tanning sessions, I repeated an untrue claim which appeared in Slovene media, so I can only offer my unreserved and unconditional apology.</p>
<p>I would like to add that, even if the statement I falsely attributed to Chomsky were to be truly made by him, I would not consider it a patronizingly racist slur, but a fully admissible characterization in our political and ideological struggle. There are African-American intellectuals who allow themselves to be fully co-opted into the white-liberal academic establishment, and they are loved by the establishment precisely because they seem “one of us,” white with a darkened skin. This is why, I think, the statement I falsely attributed to Chomsky does NOT amount to the same as Silvio Berlusconi’s misleadingly similar characterization of Obama as beautiful and well tanned: Berlusconi’s remark dismissed Obama’s blackness as an endearing eccentricity, thus obliterating the historical meaning of the fact that an African-American was elected President, while the remark I falsely attributed to Chomsky, if accurate, would point towards the ambiguous way Obama’s blackness can be instrumentalized to obfuscate our crucial political and economic struggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: Boris Rutar</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8269</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Rutar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8269</guid>
		<description>Ja... tako Keneddy kot Obama sta nekakšni rock zvezdi, ki že s svojo podobo na TV  &quot;zrušita ceno nafte na 50 USD&quot;.  Spomnimo se, da je bil eden najznamenitejših stavkov Keneddy-a: &quot;Ne sprašukte se kaj lahko država stori za vas, temveč se vprašajte, kaj lahko vi storite za državo&quot;. Po tem je šla ta država v vojno z Vietnamom.
Osebno ne bi rad videl, da bi Obama čez čas izjavil: &quot; Ne sprašujte se kam so izginile milijarde na Wall Streetu, raje se vprašajte, koliko davkov lahko še prispevam v državno blagajno&quot;.

P.S. Poleg vseh presežkov, ki jih je deležno vse povezano z Obamo je tudi ta, da je zbral rekordno količino denarja za kampanjo. In ob tem se je celo odrekel državnemu denarju, torej je vse zasebni kapital. Star, dobri inšpektor bi rekel: &quot;Follow the money!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ja&#8230; tako Keneddy kot Obama sta nekakšni rock zvezdi, ki že s svojo podobo na TV  &#8220;zrušita ceno nafte na 50 USD&#8221;.  Spomnimo se, da je bil eden najznamenitejših stavkov Keneddy-a: &#8220;Ne sprašukte se kaj lahko država stori za vas, temveč se vprašajte, kaj lahko vi storite za državo&#8221;. Po tem je šla ta država v vojno z Vietnamom.<br />
Osebno ne bi rad videl, da bi Obama čez čas izjavil: &#8221; Ne sprašujte se kam so izginile milijarde na Wall Streetu, raje se vprašajte, koliko davkov lahko še prispevam v državno blagajno&#8221;.</p>
<p>P.S. Poleg vseh presežkov, ki jih je deležno vse povezano z Obamo je tudi ta, da je zbral rekordno količino denarja za kampanjo. In ob tem se je celo odrekel državnemu denarju, torej je vse zasebni kapital. Star, dobri inšpektor bi rekel: &#8220;Follow the money!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: Andrej Mrevlje</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8268</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrej Mrevlje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8268</guid>
		<description>Ne vem kako je bilo s Keneddyjem, ampak ta zadnje novice kažejo, da bo tokrat zanimivo in prav nič histerično.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ne vem kako je bilo s Keneddyjem, ampak ta zadnje novice kažejo, da bo tokrat zanimivo in prav nič histerično.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: BOTA</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/comment-page-1/#comment-8267</link>
		<dc:creator>BOTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/11/19/zizka-za-obamo-idealizem-ali-cinizem/#comment-8267</guid>
		<description>Vse skupaj močno spominja na histerijo v času predsednika Kennedyja. Z eno besedo blef :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vse skupaj močno spominja na histerijo v času predsednika Kennedyja. Z eno besedo blef <img src='http://razgledi.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
