<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Komentarji na: Evropski poslanci znajo poskrbeti zase, ugotavlja revizor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razgledi.net/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/</link>
	<description>družbene, politične, kulturne, ekonomske in okoljske razprave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:20:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Avtor: darja</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/comment-page-1/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator>darja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-3902</guid>
		<description>MEPs vote to keep their expenses scams secret

Senior members of the European Parliament turned their fire on a whistle-blower for disclosing the existence of a confidential report into widespread misuse of expenses yesterday as they voted for it to stay secret.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3441660.ece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MEPs vote to keep their expenses scams secret</p>
<p>Senior members of the European Parliament turned their fire on a whistle-blower for disclosing the existence of a confidential report into widespread misuse of expenses yesterday as they voted for it to stay secret.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3441660.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....441660.ece</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: REVIZOR UGOTAVLJA: EVROPSKI POSLANCI ZNAJO POSKRBETI ZASE</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/comment-page-1/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator>REVIZOR UGOTAVLJA: EVROPSKI POSLANCI ZNAJO POSKRBETI ZASE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-3901</guid>
		<description>[...] http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/" rel="nofollow">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/.....a-revizor/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: Der Komisar</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/comment-page-1/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Komisar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>Whatever. Mene bolj zanima, koliko davkoplacevalskega denarja zmece slovenska vlada za luksuzna stanovanja diplomatov v Bruslju. To bi bila dodana vrednost za ta blog. Poznam enega slovenskega uradnicka, ki ubozec sameva v 120m2 fletu. Cena: 2000 evrov/mesec. Ampak slavnega slovenskega predsedovanja vendar ne bomo mazali s taksnimi neljubimi podrobnostmi, morda bi se kaksnemu Slovencu, ki se z 850 evri povprecne place trudi preziveti v Ljubljani, to zdelo nepotrebno zapravljanje.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever. Mene bolj zanima, koliko davkoplacevalskega denarja zmece slovenska vlada za luksuzna stanovanja diplomatov v Bruslju. To bi bila dodana vrednost za ta blog. Poznam enega slovenskega uradnicka, ki ubozec sameva v 120m2 fletu. Cena: 2000 evrov/mesec. Ampak slavnega slovenskega predsedovanja vendar ne bomo mazali s taksnimi neljubimi podrobnostmi, morda bi se kaksnemu Slovencu, ki se z 850 evri povprecne place trudi preziveti v Ljubljani, to zdelo nepotrebno zapravljanje.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Avtor: darja</title>
		<link>http://razgledi.net/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/comment-page-1/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator>darja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razgledi.net/blog/2008/02/22/evropski-poslanci-znajo-poskrbeti-zase-ugotavlja-revizor/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description>This text is a classic example of EU institutional stupidity. Bad news does not exist. And, anybody who says so is a liar (that’s you Chris). Eursoc also explores the mindset. Anyway it is terribly complicated accountancy thing – too complicated for you and definitely, definitely not fraud. Moreover, this actually a technical thing, a “systems analysis”, it is not a political thing.

Anybody who says it is a political thing is being critical. People who are critical are worse than the bad news (that doesn’t exist anyway), see England Expects for another example. To stop criticism, and the possibility people might confuse something technical (above their heads and not their business, i.e. confidential) it must be kept secret.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/brunowaterfield/feb08/mepfraud.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This text is a classic example of EU institutional stupidity. Bad news does not exist. And, anybody who says so is a liar (that’s you Chris). Eursoc also explores the mindset. Anyway it is terribly complicated accountancy thing – too complicated for you and definitely, definitely not fraud. Moreover, this actually a technical thing, a “systems analysis”, it is not a political thing.</p>
<p>Anybody who says it is a political thing is being critical. People who are critical are worse than the bad news (that doesn’t exist anyway), see England Expects for another example. To stop criticism, and the possibility people might confuse something technical (above their heads and not their business, i.e. confidential) it must be kept secret.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/brunowaterfield/feb08/mepfraud.htm" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/f.....pfraud.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
